The Cost of Price Incentives: An Empirical Analysis of Motivation Crowding-Out
Impact in
- Safety Research 396
Classified as
- Journal
- American Economic Review
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w6787746 →Countries where authors are citing The Cost of Price Incentives: An Empirical Analysis of Motivation Crowding-Out
This map shows the geographic impact of The Cost of Price Incentives: An Empirical Analysis of Motivation Crowding-Out. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by The Cost of Price Incentives: An Empirical Analysis of Motivation Crowding-Out with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Cost of Price Incentives: An Empirical Analysis of Motivation Crowding-Out more than expected).
Fields of papers citing The Cost of Price Incentives: An Empirical Analysis of Motivation Crowding-Out
This network shows the impact of The Cost of Price Incentives: An Empirical Analysis of Motivation Crowding-Out. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the The Cost of Price Incentives: An Empirical Analysis of Motivation Crowding-Out.
About The Cost of Price Incentives: An Empirical Analysis of Motivation Crowding-Out
This paper, published in 1997, received 1.0k indexed citations . Written by Bruno S. Frey and Felix Oberholzer‐Gee covering the research area of General Decision Sciences, Economics and Econometrics and Safety Research. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Safety Research (396 citations), Economics and Econometrics (358 citations), Sociology and Political Science (236 citations), Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law (136 citations) and General Decision Sciences (133 citations). Published in American Economic Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w6787746.