The actor and the observer : Divergent perceptions of the causes of behavior
Impact in
- Authors
- EDWARD E. JONES
- Journal
- Medical Entomology and Zoology
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w67577693 →Countries where authors are citing The actor and the observer : Divergent perceptions of the causes of behavior
This map shows the geographic impact of The actor and the observer : Divergent perceptions of the causes of behavior. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by The actor and the observer : Divergent perceptions of the causes of behavior with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The actor and the observer : Divergent perceptions of the causes of behavior more than expected).
Fields of papers citing The actor and the observer : Divergent perceptions of the causes of behavior
This network shows the impact of The actor and the observer : Divergent perceptions of the causes of behavior. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the The actor and the observer : Divergent perceptions of the causes of behavior.
About The actor and the observer : Divergent perceptions of the causes of behavior
This paper, published in 1972, received 639 indexed citations . Written by EDWARD E. JONES. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Sociology and Political Science (304 citations), Social Psychology (274 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (108 citations), Applied Psychology (79 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (74 citations). Published in Medical Entomology and Zoology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w67577693.