Teaching Critical Thinking: Practical Wisdom
Impact in
- Education 272
Classified as
- Authors
- bell hooks
- Journal
- Medical Entomology and Zoology
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w67448602 →Countries where authors are citing Teaching Critical Thinking: Practical Wisdom
This map shows the geographic impact of Teaching Critical Thinking: Practical Wisdom. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Teaching Critical Thinking: Practical Wisdom with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Teaching Critical Thinking: Practical Wisdom more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Teaching Critical Thinking: Practical Wisdom
This network shows the impact of Teaching Critical Thinking: Practical Wisdom. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Teaching Critical Thinking: Practical Wisdom.
About Teaching Critical Thinking: Practical Wisdom
This paper, published in 2009, received 481 indexed citations . Written by bell hooks covering the research area of Education. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Education (272 citations), Sociology and Political Science (189 citations), Gender Studies (54 citations), Political Science and International Relations (42 citations) and Literature and Literary Theory (39 citations). Published in Medical Entomology and Zoology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w67448602.