Russell and Burch's 3Rs then and now: the need for clarity in definition and purpose.
Impact in
Classified as
- Journal
- PubMed
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w66089174 →Countries where authors are citing Russell and Burch's 3Rs then and now: the need for clarity in definition and purpose.
This map shows the geographic impact of Russell and Burch's 3Rs then and now: the need for clarity in definition and purpose.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Russell and Burch's 3Rs then and now: the need for clarity in definition and purpose. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Russell and Burch's 3Rs then and now: the need for clarity in definition and purpose. more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Russell and Burch's 3Rs then and now: the need for clarity in definition and purpose.
This network shows the impact of Russell and Burch's 3Rs then and now: the need for clarity in definition and purpose.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Russell and Burch's 3Rs then and now: the need for clarity in definition and purpose..
About Russell and Burch's 3Rs then and now: the need for clarity in definition and purpose.
This paper, published in 2015, received 397 indexed citations . Written by Jerrold Tannenbaum and B. Taylor Bennett covering the research area of Small Animals. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Small Animals (93 citations), Molecular Biology (75 citations), Biomedical Engineering (68 citations), Physiology (32 citations) and Oncology (29 citations). Published in PubMed.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w66089174.