Crack Problems in the Classical Theory of Elasticity
Impact in
Classified as
- Authors
- I. N. SneddonM. Lowengrub
- Journal
- Medical Entomology and Zoology
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w64503227 →Countries where authors are citing Crack Problems in the Classical Theory of Elasticity
This map shows the geographic impact of Crack Problems in the Classical Theory of Elasticity. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Crack Problems in the Classical Theory of Elasticity with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Crack Problems in the Classical Theory of Elasticity more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Crack Problems in the Classical Theory of Elasticity
This network shows the impact of Crack Problems in the Classical Theory of Elasticity. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Crack Problems in the Classical Theory of Elasticity.
About Crack Problems in the Classical Theory of Elasticity
This paper, published in 1969, received 824 indexed citations . Written by I. N. Sneddon and M. Lowengrub covering the research area of Materials Chemistry and Mechanics of Materials. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Mechanics of Materials (640 citations), Mechanical Engineering (189 citations), Civil and Structural Engineering (144 citations), Geophysics (124 citations) and Materials Chemistry (110 citations). Published in Medical Entomology and Zoology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w64503227.