A Novel Principle of the Computation of Stress Intensity Factors
Impact in
Classified as
- Authors
- H. F. Bueckner
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w6307053 →Countries where authors are citing A Novel Principle of the Computation of Stress Intensity Factors
This map shows the geographic impact of A Novel Principle of the Computation of Stress Intensity Factors. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A Novel Principle of the Computation of Stress Intensity Factors with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A Novel Principle of the Computation of Stress Intensity Factors more than expected).
Fields of papers citing A Novel Principle of the Computation of Stress Intensity Factors
This network shows the impact of A Novel Principle of the Computation of Stress Intensity Factors. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the A Novel Principle of the Computation of Stress Intensity Factors.
About A Novel Principle of the Computation of Stress Intensity Factors
This paper, published in 1970, received 766 indexed citations . Written by H. F. Bueckner covering the research area of Materials Chemistry and Mechanics of Materials. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Mechanics of Materials (688 citations), Civil and Structural Engineering (250 citations), Mechanical Engineering (246 citations), Materials Chemistry (101 citations) and Building and Construction (47 citations). Published in ZAMM ‐ Journal of Applied Mathematics and Mechanics / Zeitschrift für Angewandte Mathematik und Mechanik.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w6307053.