Advancing energy justice: The triumvirate of tenets
Impact in
- Pollution 190
Classified as
- Journal
- Stirling Online Research Repository (University of Stirling)
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w61208968 →Countries where authors are citing Advancing energy justice: The triumvirate of tenets
This map shows the geographic impact of Advancing energy justice: The triumvirate of tenets. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Advancing energy justice: The triumvirate of tenets with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Advancing energy justice: The triumvirate of tenets more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Advancing energy justice: The triumvirate of tenets
This network shows the impact of Advancing energy justice: The triumvirate of tenets. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Advancing energy justice: The triumvirate of tenets.
About Advancing energy justice: The triumvirate of tenets
This paper, published in 2013, received 336 indexed citations . Written by Darren McCauley, Raphael J. Heffron, Hannes R. Stephan and Kirsten Jenkins covering the research area of Sociology and Political Science and Global and Planetary Change. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Sociology and Political Science (210 citations), Pollution (190 citations), Global and Planetary Change (92 citations), Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment (51 citations) and Electrical and Electronic Engineering (46 citations). Published in Stirling Online Research Repository (University of Stirling).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w61208968.