Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Sentiment Analysis of Short Texts
Impact in
Classified as
- Journal
- International Conference on Computational Linguistics
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w6006368 →Countries where authors are citing Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Sentiment Analysis of Short Texts
This map shows the geographic impact of Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Sentiment Analysis of Short Texts. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Sentiment Analysis of Short Texts with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Sentiment Analysis of Short Texts more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Sentiment Analysis of Short Texts
This network shows the impact of Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Sentiment Analysis of Short Texts. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Sentiment Analysis of Short Texts.
About Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Sentiment Analysis of Short Texts
This paper, published in 2014, received 873 indexed citations . Written by Cícero dos Santos and Maíra Gatti de Bayser covering the research area of Artificial Intelligence. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Artificial Intelligence (749 citations), Information Systems (173 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (80 citations), Sociology and Political Science (51 citations) and Signal Processing (45 citations). Published in International Conference on Computational Linguistics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w6006368.