Contact and Conflict in Intergroup Encounters
Impact in
- Authors
- Miles HewstoneRupert Brown
- Journal
- Medical Entomology and Zoology
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w59006017 →Countries where authors are citing Contact and Conflict in Intergroup Encounters
This map shows the geographic impact of Contact and Conflict in Intergroup Encounters. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Contact and Conflict in Intergroup Encounters with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Contact and Conflict in Intergroup Encounters more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Contact and Conflict in Intergroup Encounters
This network shows the impact of Contact and Conflict in Intergroup Encounters. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Contact and Conflict in Intergroup Encounters.
About Contact and Conflict in Intergroup Encounters
This paper, published in 1986, received 882 indexed citations . Written by Miles Hewstone and Rupert Brown. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Sociology and Political Science (695 citations), Social Psychology (381 citations), Gender Studies (152 citations), Education (101 citations) and Communication (84 citations). Published in Medical Entomology and Zoology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w59006017.