Female Forms: Experiencing and Understanding Disability
Impact in
- Safety Research 416
- Authors
- Carol Thomas
- Journal
- Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University)
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w54800396 →Countries where authors are citing Female Forms: Experiencing and Understanding Disability
This map shows the geographic impact of Female Forms: Experiencing and Understanding Disability. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Female Forms: Experiencing and Understanding Disability with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Female Forms: Experiencing and Understanding Disability more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Female Forms: Experiencing and Understanding Disability
This network shows the impact of Female Forms: Experiencing and Understanding Disability. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Female Forms: Experiencing and Understanding Disability.
About Female Forms: Experiencing and Understanding Disability
This paper, published in 1999, received 677 indexed citations . Written by Carol Thomas. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Safety Research (416 citations), Sociology and Political Science (281 citations), Education (182 citations), Clinical Psychology (141 citations) and Gender Studies (81 citations). Published in Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w54800396.