Intersegmental coordination during reaching at natural visual objects

539 indexed citations
published 1981

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w4987549 →

Countries where authors are citing Intersegmental coordination during reaching at natural visual objects

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Intersegmental coordination during reaching at natural visual objects. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Intersegmental coordination during reaching at natural visual objects with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Intersegmental coordination during reaching at natural visual objects more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Intersegmental coordination during reaching at natural visual objects

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Intersegmental coordination during reaching at natural visual objects. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Intersegmental coordination during reaching at natural visual objects.

About Intersegmental coordination during reaching at natural visual objects

This paper, published in 1981, received 539 indexed citations . Written by Marc Jeannerod covering the research area of Cognitive Neuroscience. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Cognitive Neuroscience (469 citations), Biomedical Engineering (230 citations), Social Psychology (174 citations), Control and Systems Engineering (91 citations) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (57 citations).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w4987549.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact