Early intervention in psychosis. The critical period hypothesis.
Impact in
Classified as
- Journal
- PubMed
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w48815263 →Countries where authors are citing Early intervention in psychosis. The critical period hypothesis.
This map shows the geographic impact of Early intervention in psychosis. The critical period hypothesis.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Early intervention in psychosis. The critical period hypothesis. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Early intervention in psychosis. The critical period hypothesis. more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Early intervention in psychosis. The critical period hypothesis.
This network shows the impact of Early intervention in psychosis. The critical period hypothesis.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Early intervention in psychosis. The critical period hypothesis..
About Early intervention in psychosis. The critical period hypothesis.
This paper, published in 1998, received 612 indexed citations . Written by Max Birchwood, Paula Todd and Christopher Jackson covering the research area of Philosophy and Psychiatry and Mental health. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Psychiatry and Mental health (533 citations), Clinical Psychology (262 citations), Philosophy (260 citations), Social Psychology (118 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (65 citations). Published in PubMed.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w48815263.