Informed Consent: Legal Theory and Clinical Practice
Impact in
Classified as
- Journal
- The Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) Network (American Medical Association)
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w45942811 →Countries where authors are citing Informed Consent: Legal Theory and Clinical Practice
This map shows the geographic impact of Informed Consent: Legal Theory and Clinical Practice. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Informed Consent: Legal Theory and Clinical Practice with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Informed Consent: Legal Theory and Clinical Practice more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Informed Consent: Legal Theory and Clinical Practice
This network shows the impact of Informed Consent: Legal Theory and Clinical Practice. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Informed Consent: Legal Theory and Clinical Practice.
About Informed Consent: Legal Theory and Clinical Practice
This paper, published in 1987, received 547 indexed citations . Written by Paul S. Appelbaum, Charles W. Lidz and Alan Meisel covering the research area of General Health Professions, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. It is primarily cited by scholars working on General Health Professions (307 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (299 citations), Clinical Psychology (149 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (95 citations) and Pharmacy (70 citations). Published in The Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) Network (American Medical Association).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w45942811.