Mass Media Effects Research : Advances Through Meta-Analysis
Impact in
Classified as
- Journal
- Routledge eBooks
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w452837 →Countries where authors are citing Mass Media Effects Research : Advances Through Meta-Analysis
This map shows the geographic impact of Mass Media Effects Research : Advances Through Meta-Analysis. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mass Media Effects Research : Advances Through Meta-Analysis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mass Media Effects Research : Advances Through Meta-Analysis more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Mass Media Effects Research : Advances Through Meta-Analysis
This network shows the impact of Mass Media Effects Research : Advances Through Meta-Analysis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Mass Media Effects Research : Advances Through Meta-Analysis.
About Mass Media Effects Research : Advances Through Meta-Analysis
This paper, published in 2006, received 407 indexed citations . Written by David R. Roskos‐Ewoldsen, Mark R. Klinger and Beverly Roskos‐Ewoldsen covering the research area of Literature and Literary Theory and Education. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Sociology and Political Science (213 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (123 citations), Communication (111 citations), Gender Studies (108 citations) and Social Psychology (98 citations). Published in Routledge eBooks.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w452837.