Attachment in adults: Clinical and developmental perspectives.
Impact in
- Journal
- Guilford Press eBooks
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w4477688 →Countries where authors are citing Attachment in adults: Clinical and developmental perspectives.
This map shows the geographic impact of Attachment in adults: Clinical and developmental perspectives.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Attachment in adults: Clinical and developmental perspectives. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Attachment in adults: Clinical and developmental perspectives. more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Attachment in adults: Clinical and developmental perspectives.
This network shows the impact of Attachment in adults: Clinical and developmental perspectives.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Attachment in adults: Clinical and developmental perspectives..
About Attachment in adults: Clinical and developmental perspectives.
This paper, published in 1994, received 719 indexed citations . Written by Michael R. Sperling and William Berman. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Social Psychology (482 citations), Clinical Psychology (399 citations), Demography (143 citations), Sociology and Political Science (139 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (98 citations). Published in Guilford Press eBooks.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w4477688.