Social cognition and social development : a sociocultural perspective
Impact in
- Journal
- Cambridge University Press eBooks
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w3709285 →Countries where authors are citing Social cognition and social development : a sociocultural perspective
This map shows the geographic impact of Social cognition and social development : a sociocultural perspective. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Social cognition and social development : a sociocultural perspective with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Social cognition and social development : a sociocultural perspective more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Social cognition and social development : a sociocultural perspective
This network shows the impact of Social cognition and social development : a sociocultural perspective. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Social cognition and social development : a sociocultural perspective.
About Social cognition and social development : a sociocultural perspective
This paper, published in 1985, received 431 indexed citations . Written by E. Tory Higgins, Diane N. Ruble and Willard W. Hartup. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Clinical Psychology (232 citations), Social Psychology (212 citations), Education (137 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (83 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (80 citations). Published in Cambridge University Press eBooks.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w3709285.