Problem-solving therapy : a social competence approach to clinical intervention
Impact in
Classified as
- Authors
- Thomas J. D’Zurilla
- Journal
- Springer eBooks
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w3690472 →Countries where authors are citing Problem-solving therapy : a social competence approach to clinical intervention
This map shows the geographic impact of Problem-solving therapy : a social competence approach to clinical intervention. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Problem-solving therapy : a social competence approach to clinical intervention with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Problem-solving therapy : a social competence approach to clinical intervention more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Problem-solving therapy : a social competence approach to clinical intervention
This network shows the impact of Problem-solving therapy : a social competence approach to clinical intervention. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Problem-solving therapy : a social competence approach to clinical intervention.
About Problem-solving therapy : a social competence approach to clinical intervention
This paper, published in 1986, received 569 indexed citations . Written by Thomas J. D’Zurilla covering the research area of Speech and Hearing. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Clinical Psychology (347 citations), Speech and Hearing (212 citations), Social Psychology (147 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (73 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (65 citations). Published in Springer eBooks.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w3690472.