Messy genetic algorithms: motivation, analysis, and first results
Impact in
Classified as
- Authors
- David E. GoldbergKalyanmoy Deb
- Journal
- Complex Systems
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w3597858 →Countries where authors are citing Messy genetic algorithms: motivation, analysis, and first results
This map shows the geographic impact of Messy genetic algorithms: motivation, analysis, and first results. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Messy genetic algorithms: motivation, analysis, and first results with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Messy genetic algorithms: motivation, analysis, and first results more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Messy genetic algorithms: motivation, analysis, and first results
This network shows the impact of Messy genetic algorithms: motivation, analysis, and first results. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Messy genetic algorithms: motivation, analysis, and first results.
About Messy genetic algorithms: motivation, analysis, and first results
This paper, published in 1989, received 959 indexed citations . Written by David E. Goldberg and Kalyanmoy Deb covering the research area of Artificial Intelligence. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Artificial Intelligence (592 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (249 citations), Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering (114 citations), Molecular Biology (80 citations) and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (66 citations). Published in Complex Systems.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w3597858.