Homosexualities : a study of diversity among men and women

721 indexed citations
published 1978
Journal
DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library)

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w3268513 →

Countries where authors are citing Homosexualities : a study of diversity among men and women

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Homosexualities : a study of diversity among men and women. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Homosexualities : a study of diversity among men and women with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Homosexualities : a study of diversity among men and women more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Homosexualities : a study of diversity among men and women

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Homosexualities : a study of diversity among men and women. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Homosexualities : a study of diversity among men and women.

About Homosexualities : a study of diversity among men and women

This paper, published in 1978, received 721 indexed citations . Written by Alan P. Bell and Martin S. Weinberg. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Social Psychology (451 citations), Sociology and Political Science (254 citations), Clinical Psychology (203 citations), Reproductive Medicine (126 citations) and Gender Studies (122 citations). Published in DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w3268513.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact