Shoulder disorders in general practice: prognostic indicators of outcome.

376 indexed citations
published 1996

Impact in

Classified as

Countries where authors are citing Shoulder disorders in general practice: prognostic indicators of outcome.

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Shoulder disorders in general practice: prognostic indicators of outcome.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Shoulder disorders in general practice: prognostic indicators of outcome. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Shoulder disorders in general practice: prognostic indicators of outcome. more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Shoulder disorders in general practice: prognostic indicators of outcome.

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Shoulder disorders in general practice: prognostic indicators of outcome.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Shoulder disorders in general practice: prognostic indicators of outcome..

About Shoulder disorders in general practice: prognostic indicators of outcome.

This paper, published in 1996, received 376 indexed citations . Written by Daniëlle van der Windt, Bart W. Koes, A. J. P. Boeke, W. Devillé, Bareld A. de Jong and L.M. Bouter covering the research area of Surgery. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Surgery (255 citations), Pharmacology (86 citations), Epidemiology (50 citations), Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (23 citations) and Cell Biology (16 citations). Published in PubMed.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w32070013.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact