Unraveling in Guessing Games: An Experimental Study
Impact in
- Safety Research 537
Classified as
- Authors
- Rosemarie Nagel
- Journal
- American Economic Review
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w2892845 →Countries where authors are citing Unraveling in Guessing Games: An Experimental Study
This map shows the geographic impact of Unraveling in Guessing Games: An Experimental Study. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Unraveling in Guessing Games: An Experimental Study with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Unraveling in Guessing Games: An Experimental Study more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Unraveling in Guessing Games: An Experimental Study
This network shows the impact of Unraveling in Guessing Games: An Experimental Study. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Unraveling in Guessing Games: An Experimental Study.
About Unraveling in Guessing Games: An Experimental Study
This paper, published in 2007, received 813 indexed citations . Written by Rosemarie Nagel covering the research area of Sociology and Political Science, Safety Research and Management Science and Operations Research. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Safety Research (537 citations), Management Science and Operations Research (371 citations), Economics and Econometrics (274 citations), General Decision Sciences (233 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (159 citations). Published in American Economic Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w2892845.