Linguistic minorities and modernity : a sociolinguistic ethnography
Impact in
Classified as
- Authors
- Monica Heller
- Journal
- Longman eBooks
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w2887361 →Countries where authors are citing Linguistic minorities and modernity : a sociolinguistic ethnography
This map shows the geographic impact of Linguistic minorities and modernity : a sociolinguistic ethnography. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Linguistic minorities and modernity : a sociolinguistic ethnography with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Linguistic minorities and modernity : a sociolinguistic ethnography more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Linguistic minorities and modernity : a sociolinguistic ethnography
This network shows the impact of Linguistic minorities and modernity : a sociolinguistic ethnography. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Linguistic minorities and modernity : a sociolinguistic ethnography.
About Linguistic minorities and modernity : a sociolinguistic ethnography
This paper, published in 1999, received 483 indexed citations . Written by Monica Heller covering the research area of Linguistics and Language and Sociology and Political Science. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Linguistics and Language (402 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (267 citations), Language and Linguistics (257 citations), Sociology and Political Science (76 citations) and Education (51 citations). Published in Longman eBooks.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w2887361.