Internet Communication and Qualitative Research: A Handbook for Researching Online
Impact in
- Communication 131
Classified as
- Authors
- Chris MannFiona A. Stewart
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w27699321 →Countries where authors are citing Internet Communication and Qualitative Research: A Handbook for Researching Online
This map shows the geographic impact of Internet Communication and Qualitative Research: A Handbook for Researching Online. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Internet Communication and Qualitative Research: A Handbook for Researching Online with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Internet Communication and Qualitative Research: A Handbook for Researching Online more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Internet Communication and Qualitative Research: A Handbook for Researching Online
This network shows the impact of Internet Communication and Qualitative Research: A Handbook for Researching Online. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Internet Communication and Qualitative Research: A Handbook for Researching Online.
About Internet Communication and Qualitative Research: A Handbook for Researching Online
This paper, published in 2000, received 512 indexed citations . Written by Chris Mann and Fiona A. Stewart covering the research area of Sociology and Political Science. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Sociology and Political Science (250 citations), Communication (131 citations), Education (116 citations), Social Psychology (48 citations) and Clinical Psychology (44 citations).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w27699321.