Clock Drawing: A Neuropsychological Analysis
Impact in
Classified as
- Journal
- Medical Entomology and Zoology
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w26565487 →Countries where authors are citing Clock Drawing: A Neuropsychological Analysis
This map shows the geographic impact of Clock Drawing: A Neuropsychological Analysis. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Clock Drawing: A Neuropsychological Analysis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Clock Drawing: A Neuropsychological Analysis more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Clock Drawing: A Neuropsychological Analysis
This network shows the impact of Clock Drawing: A Neuropsychological Analysis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Clock Drawing: A Neuropsychological Analysis.
About Clock Drawing: A Neuropsychological Analysis
This paper, published in 1994, received 442 indexed citations . Written by Morris Freedman, Larry Leach, Edith Kaplan, Gordon Winocur, Kenneth I. Shulman and Dean C. Delis covering the research area of Automotive Engineering, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Conservation. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Psychiatry and Mental health (290 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (164 citations), Physiology (75 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (41 citations) and Geriatrics and Gerontology (35 citations). Published in Medical Entomology and Zoology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w26565487.