NONLINEAR UNMIXING OF HYPERSPECTRAL IMAGES: MODELS AND ALGORITHMS
Impact in
- Media Technology 279
Classified as
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w22710312 →Countries where authors are citing NONLINEAR UNMIXING OF HYPERSPECTRAL IMAGES: MODELS AND ALGORITHMS
This map shows the geographic impact of NONLINEAR UNMIXING OF HYPERSPECTRAL IMAGES: MODELS AND ALGORITHMS. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by NONLINEAR UNMIXING OF HYPERSPECTRAL IMAGES: MODELS AND ALGORITHMS with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites NONLINEAR UNMIXING OF HYPERSPECTRAL IMAGES: MODELS AND ALGORITHMS more than expected).
Fields of papers citing NONLINEAR UNMIXING OF HYPERSPECTRAL IMAGES: MODELS AND ALGORITHMS
This network shows the impact of NONLINEAR UNMIXING OF HYPERSPECTRAL IMAGES: MODELS AND ALGORITHMS. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the NONLINEAR UNMIXING OF HYPERSPECTRAL IMAGES: MODELS AND ALGORITHMS.
About NONLINEAR UNMIXING OF HYPERSPECTRAL IMAGES: MODELS AND ALGORITHMS
This paper, published in 2014, received 327 indexed citations . Written by Nicolas Dobigeon, Jean‐Yves Tourneret, Cédric Richard, J.C.M. Bermudez, Stephen McLaughlin and Alfred O. Hero covering the research area of Atmospheric Science and Media Technology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Media Technology (279 citations), Atmospheric Science (145 citations), Artificial Intelligence (45 citations), Analytical Chemistry (44 citations) and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (44 citations).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w22710312.