CONTINUOUS OPINION DYNAMICS UNDER BOUNDED CONFIDENCE: A SURVEY
Impact in
Classified as
- Authors
- Jan Lorenz
- Journal
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w22700648 →Countries where authors are citing CONTINUOUS OPINION DYNAMICS UNDER BOUNDED CONFIDENCE: A SURVEY
This map shows the geographic impact of CONTINUOUS OPINION DYNAMICS UNDER BOUNDED CONFIDENCE: A SURVEY. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by CONTINUOUS OPINION DYNAMICS UNDER BOUNDED CONFIDENCE: A SURVEY with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites CONTINUOUS OPINION DYNAMICS UNDER BOUNDED CONFIDENCE: A SURVEY more than expected).
Fields of papers citing CONTINUOUS OPINION DYNAMICS UNDER BOUNDED CONFIDENCE: A SURVEY
This network shows the impact of CONTINUOUS OPINION DYNAMICS UNDER BOUNDED CONFIDENCE: A SURVEY. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the CONTINUOUS OPINION DYNAMICS UNDER BOUNDED CONFIDENCE: A SURVEY.
About CONTINUOUS OPINION DYNAMICS UNDER BOUNDED CONFIDENCE: A SURVEY
This paper, published in 2012, received 386 indexed citations . Written by Jan Lorenz covering the research area of Statistical and Nonlinear Physics and Economics and Econometrics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (362 citations), Sociology and Political Science (172 citations), Communication (59 citations), Computer Networks and Communications (42 citations) and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (41 citations). Published in RePEc: Research Papers in Economics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w22700648.