Rydberg atom quantum technologies
Impact in
Classified as
- Journal
- Strathprints: The University of Strathclyde institutional repository (University of Strathclyde)
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w22700176 →Countries where authors are citing Rydberg atom quantum technologies
This map shows the geographic impact of Rydberg atom quantum technologies. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rydberg atom quantum technologies with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rydberg atom quantum technologies more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Rydberg atom quantum technologies
This network shows the impact of Rydberg atom quantum technologies. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Rydberg atom quantum technologies.
About Rydberg atom quantum technologies
This paper, published in 2019, received 250 indexed citations . Written by Charles S. Adams, Jonathan D. Pritchard and James P. Shaffer covering the research area of Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Artificial Intelligence. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (236 citations), Artificial Intelligence (102 citations), Materials Chemistry (16 citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (13 citations) and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (9 citations). Published in Strathprints: The University of Strathclyde institutional repository (University of Strathclyde).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w22700176.