Condensed Matter Theory of Dipolar Quantum Gases

390 indexed citations
published 2016

Countries where authors are citing Condensed Matter Theory of Dipolar Quantum Gases

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Condensed Matter Theory of Dipolar Quantum Gases. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Condensed Matter Theory of Dipolar Quantum Gases with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Condensed Matter Theory of Dipolar Quantum Gases more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Condensed Matter Theory of Dipolar Quantum Gases

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Condensed Matter Theory of Dipolar Quantum Gases. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Condensed Matter Theory of Dipolar Quantum Gases.

About Condensed Matter Theory of Dipolar Quantum Gases

This paper, published in 2016, received 390 indexed citations . Written by М. А. Баранов, Marcello Dalmonte, Guido Pupillo and P. Zoller covering the research area of Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Condensed Matter Physics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (383 citations), Condensed Matter Physics (84 citations), Artificial Intelligence (40 citations), Spectroscopy (31 citations) and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (17 citations).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w22698745.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact