The physics of dipolar bosonic quantum gases
Impact in
Classified as
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w22698207 →Countries where authors are citing The physics of dipolar bosonic quantum gases
This map shows the geographic impact of The physics of dipolar bosonic quantum gases. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by The physics of dipolar bosonic quantum gases with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The physics of dipolar bosonic quantum gases more than expected).
Fields of papers citing The physics of dipolar bosonic quantum gases
This network shows the impact of The physics of dipolar bosonic quantum gases. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the The physics of dipolar bosonic quantum gases.
About The physics of dipolar bosonic quantum gases
This paper, published in 2012, received 468 indexed citations . Written by Thierry Lahaye, C. Menotti, L. Santos, Maciej Lewenstein and Tilman Pfau covering the research area of Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (458 citations), Condensed Matter Physics (111 citations), Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (71 citations), Artificial Intelligence (31 citations) and Spectroscopy (19 citations).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w22698207.