Facilitating Computer Conferencing: Recommendations from the Field.
Impact in
- Education 363
Classified as
- Authors
- Zane L. Berge
- Journal
- Educational Technology archive
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w2090717 →Countries where authors are citing Facilitating Computer Conferencing: Recommendations from the Field.
This map shows the geographic impact of Facilitating Computer Conferencing: Recommendations from the Field.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Facilitating Computer Conferencing: Recommendations from the Field. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Facilitating Computer Conferencing: Recommendations from the Field. more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Facilitating Computer Conferencing: Recommendations from the Field.
This network shows the impact of Facilitating Computer Conferencing: Recommendations from the Field.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Facilitating Computer Conferencing: Recommendations from the Field..
About Facilitating Computer Conferencing: Recommendations from the Field.
This paper, published in 1995, received 434 indexed citations . Written by Zane L. Berge covering the research area of Education. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Education (363 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (188 citations), Computer Science Applications (97 citations), Social Psychology (69 citations) and Communication (54 citations). Published in Educational Technology archive.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w2090717.