Food habits of albacore, bluefin tuna, and bonito in California waters.
Impact in
- Ecology 706
Classified as
- Authors
- Leo PinkasOliphant
- Journal
- Fishery Bulletin
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w15587691 →Countries where authors are citing Food habits of albacore, bluefin tuna, and bonito in California waters.
This map shows the geographic impact of Food habits of albacore, bluefin tuna, and bonito in California waters.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Food habits of albacore, bluefin tuna, and bonito in California waters. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Food habits of albacore, bluefin tuna, and bonito in California waters. more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Food habits of albacore, bluefin tuna, and bonito in California waters.
This network shows the impact of Food habits of albacore, bluefin tuna, and bonito in California waters.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Food habits of albacore, bluefin tuna, and bonito in California waters..
About Food habits of albacore, bluefin tuna, and bonito in California waters.
This paper, published in 1971, received 1.3k indexed citations . Written by Leo Pinkas and Oliphant covering the research area of Global and Planetary Change. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Global and Planetary Change (907 citations), Ecology (706 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (690 citations), Aquatic Science (396 citations) and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (145 citations). Published in Fishery Bulletin.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w15587691.