Application of a mechanical heart and lung apparatus to cardiac surgery.
Impact in
- Surgery 313
Classified as
- Journal
- PubMed
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w153776 →Countries where authors are citing Application of a mechanical heart and lung apparatus to cardiac surgery.
This map shows the geographic impact of Application of a mechanical heart and lung apparatus to cardiac surgery.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Application of a mechanical heart and lung apparatus to cardiac surgery. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Application of a mechanical heart and lung apparatus to cardiac surgery. more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Application of a mechanical heart and lung apparatus to cardiac surgery.
This network shows the impact of Application of a mechanical heart and lung apparatus to cardiac surgery.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Application of a mechanical heart and lung apparatus to cardiac surgery..
About Application of a mechanical heart and lung apparatus to cardiac surgery.
This paper, published in 1954, received 602 indexed citations . covering the research area of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Surgery (313 citations), Biomedical Engineering (269 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (209 citations), Emergency Medicine (131 citations) and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (115 citations). Published in PubMed.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w153776.