Local supermassive black holes, relics of active galactic nuclei and the X-ray background
Impact in
- Instrumentation 186
Classified as
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w15198654 →Countries where authors are citing Local supermassive black holes, relics of active galactic nuclei and the X-ray background
This map shows the geographic impact of Local supermassive black holes, relics of active galactic nuclei and the X-ray background. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Local supermassive black holes, relics of active galactic nuclei and the X-ray background with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Local supermassive black holes, relics of active galactic nuclei and the X-ray background more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Local supermassive black holes, relics of active galactic nuclei and the X-ray background
This network shows the impact of Local supermassive black holes, relics of active galactic nuclei and the X-ray background. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Local supermassive black holes, relics of active galactic nuclei and the X-ray background.
About Local supermassive black holes, relics of active galactic nuclei and the X-ray background
This paper, published in 2004, received 711 indexed citations . Written by A. Marconi, G. Risaliti, R. Gilli, L. K. Hunt, R. Maiolino and M. Salvati covering the research area of Nuclear and High Energy Physics and Astronomy and Astrophysics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Astronomy and Astrophysics (708 citations), Instrumentation (186 citations), Nuclear and High Energy Physics (179 citations), Global and Planetary Change (25 citations) and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (11 citations).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w15198654.