Assessing biological integrity in running waters : a method and its rationale
Impact in
- Ecology 517
Classified as
- Authors
- James R. Karr
- Journal
- Biodiversity Heritage Library (Smithsonian Institution)
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w1144975 →Countries where authors are citing Assessing biological integrity in running waters : a method and its rationale
This map shows the geographic impact of Assessing biological integrity in running waters : a method and its rationale. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Assessing biological integrity in running waters : a method and its rationale with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Assessing biological integrity in running waters : a method and its rationale more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Assessing biological integrity in running waters : a method and its rationale
This network shows the impact of Assessing biological integrity in running waters : a method and its rationale. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Assessing biological integrity in running waters : a method and its rationale.
About Assessing biological integrity in running waters : a method and its rationale
This paper, published in 1986, received 794 indexed citations . Written by James R. Karr covering the research area of Water Science and Technology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Nature and Landscape Conservation (542 citations), Ecology (517 citations), Water Science and Technology (189 citations), Environmental Chemistry (133 citations) and Aquatic Science (118 citations). Published in Biodiversity Heritage Library (Smithsonian Institution).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w1144975.