Jubb, Kennedy, and Palmer's pathology of domestic animals
Impact in
- Small Animals 297
Classified as
- Journal
- Elsevier eBooks
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w1071308 →Countries where authors are citing Jubb, Kennedy, and Palmer's pathology of domestic animals
This map shows the geographic impact of Jubb, Kennedy, and Palmer's pathology of domestic animals. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jubb, Kennedy, and Palmer's pathology of domestic animals with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jubb, Kennedy, and Palmer's pathology of domestic animals more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Jubb, Kennedy, and Palmer's pathology of domestic animals
This network shows the impact of Jubb, Kennedy, and Palmer's pathology of domestic animals. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Jubb, Kennedy, and Palmer's pathology of domestic animals.
About Jubb, Kennedy, and Palmer's pathology of domestic animals
This paper, published in 2008, received 1.3k indexed citations . Written by M. G. Maxie, K. V. F. Jubb, Peter C. Kennedy and N. Palmer covering the research area of Animal Science and Zoology, Small Animals and Microbiology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Small Animals (297 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (259 citations), Epidemiology (196 citations), Infectious Diseases (171 citations) and Molecular Biology (164 citations). Published in Elsevier eBooks.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w1071308.