Application of the New Production Philosophy to Construction
Impact in
- Authors
- Lauri Koskela
- Journal
- Aaltodoc (Aalto University)
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w10550218 →Countries where authors are citing Application of the New Production Philosophy to Construction
This map shows the geographic impact of Application of the New Production Philosophy to Construction. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Application of the New Production Philosophy to Construction with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Application of the New Production Philosophy to Construction more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Application of the New Production Philosophy to Construction
This network shows the impact of Application of the New Production Philosophy to Construction. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Application of the New Production Philosophy to Construction.
About Application of the New Production Philosophy to Construction
This paper, published in 1992, received 848 indexed citations . Written by Lauri Koskela. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Management Science and Operations Research (571 citations), Building and Construction (444 citations), Management Information Systems (339 citations), Strategy and Management (183 citations) and Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering (128 citations). Published in Aaltodoc (Aalto University).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w10550218.