Factors Related to Physician Burnout and Its Consequences: A Review
Impact in
Classified as
- Journal
- Behavioral Sciences
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.3390/bs8110098 →Countries where authors are citing Factors Related to Physician Burnout and Its Consequences: A Review
This map shows the geographic impact of Factors Related to Physician Burnout and Its Consequences: A Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Factors Related to Physician Burnout and Its Consequences: A Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Factors Related to Physician Burnout and Its Consequences: A Review more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Factors Related to Physician Burnout and Its Consequences: A Review
This network shows the impact of Factors Related to Physician Burnout and Its Consequences: A Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Factors Related to Physician Burnout and Its Consequences: A Review.
About Factors Related to Physician Burnout and Its Consequences: A Review
This paper, published in 2018, received 580 indexed citations . Written by Rikinkumar S. Patel, Ramya Bachu, Archana Adikey and Mansi Shah covering the research area of General Health Professions and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. It is primarily cited by scholars working on General Health Professions (326 citations), Clinical Psychology (130 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (92 citations), Social Psychology (51 citations) and Gender Studies (37 citations). Published in Behavioral Sciences.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.3390/bs8110098.