Development of definitive endoderm from embryonic stem cells in culture
Impact in
- Surgery 344
Classified as
- Journal
- Development
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1242/dev.01044 →Countries where authors are citing Development of definitive endoderm from embryonic stem cells in culture
This map shows the geographic impact of Development of definitive endoderm from embryonic stem cells in culture. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Development of definitive endoderm from embryonic stem cells in culture with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Development of definitive endoderm from embryonic stem cells in culture more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Development of definitive endoderm from embryonic stem cells in culture
This network shows the impact of Development of definitive endoderm from embryonic stem cells in culture. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Development of definitive endoderm from embryonic stem cells in culture.
About Development of definitive endoderm from embryonic stem cells in culture
This paper, published in 2004, received 653 indexed citations . Written by Atsushi Kubo, Katsunori Shinozaki, John M. Shannon, Valérie Kouskoff, Marion Kennedy, Savio L.C. Woo, Hans Jörg Fehling and Gordon Keller covering the research area of Molecular Biology and Surgery. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Molecular Biology (534 citations), Surgery (344 citations), Biomedical Engineering (85 citations), Genetics (79 citations) and Hepatology (60 citations). Published in Development.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1242/dev.01044.