Annual Research Review: Enduring neurobiological effects of childhood abuse and neglect
Impact in
- Authors
- Martin H. TeicherJ Samson
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12507 →Countries where authors are citing Annual Research Review: Enduring neurobiological effects of childhood abuse and neglect
This map shows the geographic impact of Annual Research Review: Enduring neurobiological effects of childhood abuse and neglect. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Annual Research Review: Enduring neurobiological effects of childhood abuse and neglect with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Annual Research Review: Enduring neurobiological effects of childhood abuse and neglect more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Annual Research Review: Enduring neurobiological effects of childhood abuse and neglect
This network shows the impact of Annual Research Review: Enduring neurobiological effects of childhood abuse and neglect. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Annual Research Review: Enduring neurobiological effects of childhood abuse and neglect.
About Annual Research Review: Enduring neurobiological effects of childhood abuse and neglect
This paper, published in 2016, received 931 indexed citations . Written by Martin H. Teicher and J Samson. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Clinical Psychology (568 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (117 citations), Social Psychology (95 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (85 citations) and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (75 citations). Published in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12507.