Heritability of autism spectrum disorders: a meta‐analysis of twin studies
Impact in
- Genetics 306
Classified as
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12499 →Countries where authors are citing Heritability of autism spectrum disorders: a meta‐analysis of twin studies
This map shows the geographic impact of Heritability of autism spectrum disorders: a meta‐analysis of twin studies. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Heritability of autism spectrum disorders: a meta‐analysis of twin studies with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Heritability of autism spectrum disorders: a meta‐analysis of twin studies more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Heritability of autism spectrum disorders: a meta‐analysis of twin studies
This network shows the impact of Heritability of autism spectrum disorders: a meta‐analysis of twin studies. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Heritability of autism spectrum disorders: a meta‐analysis of twin studies.
About Heritability of autism spectrum disorders: a meta‐analysis of twin studies
This paper, published in 2015, received 607 indexed citations . Written by Patrick Bolton, Francesca Happé, Michael Rutter and Frühling Rijsdijk covering the research area of Cognitive Neuroscience, Epidemiology and Genetics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Cognitive Neuroscience (490 citations), Genetics (306 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (148 citations), Molecular Biology (128 citations) and Clinical Psychology (127 citations). Published in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12499.