Digital Screen Time Limits and Young Children's Psychological Well-Being: Evidence From a Population-Based Study
Impact in
- Education 121
Classified as
- Journal
- Child Development
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13007 →Countries where authors are citing Digital Screen Time Limits and Young Children's Psychological Well-Being: Evidence From a Population-Based Study
This map shows the geographic impact of Digital Screen Time Limits and Young Children's Psychological Well-Being: Evidence From a Population-Based Study. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Digital Screen Time Limits and Young Children's Psychological Well-Being: Evidence From a Population-Based Study with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Digital Screen Time Limits and Young Children's Psychological Well-Being: Evidence From a Population-Based Study more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Digital Screen Time Limits and Young Children's Psychological Well-Being: Evidence From a Population-Based Study
This network shows the impact of Digital Screen Time Limits and Young Children's Psychological Well-Being: Evidence From a Population-Based Study. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Digital Screen Time Limits and Young Children's Psychological Well-Being: Evidence From a Population-Based Study.
About Digital Screen Time Limits and Young Children's Psychological Well-Being: Evidence From a Population-Based Study
This paper, published in 2017, received 198 indexed citations . Written by Andrew K Przybylski and Netta Weinstein covering the research area of Education and Sociology and Political Science. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Education (121 citations), Sociology and Political Science (114 citations), Communication (24 citations), Clinical Psychology (22 citations) and Social Psychology (21 citations). Published in Child Development.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13007.