The motion of 180° domain walls in uniform dc magnetic fields
Impact in
Classified as
- Authors
- N. L. SchryerL. R. Walker
- Journal
- Journal of Applied Physics
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1063/1.1663252 →Countries where authors are citing The motion of 180° domain walls in uniform dc magnetic fields
This map shows the geographic impact of The motion of 180° domain walls in uniform dc magnetic fields. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by The motion of 180° domain walls in uniform dc magnetic fields with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The motion of 180° domain walls in uniform dc magnetic fields more than expected).
Fields of papers citing The motion of 180° domain walls in uniform dc magnetic fields
This network shows the impact of The motion of 180° domain walls in uniform dc magnetic fields. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the The motion of 180° domain walls in uniform dc magnetic fields.
About The motion of 180° domain walls in uniform dc magnetic fields
This paper, published in 1974, received 814 indexed citations . Written by N. L. Schryer and L. R. Walker covering the research area of Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, Nuclear and High Energy Physics and Electrical and Electronic Engineering. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (737 citations), Condensed Matter Physics (412 citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (346 citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (184 citations) and Materials Chemistry (147 citations). Published in Journal of Applied Physics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1063/1.1663252.