Shock wave study of the α ⇄ ε phase transition in iron
Impact in
- Geophysics 139
Classified as
- Authors
- L. M. BarkerR. E. Hollenbach
- Journal
- Journal of Applied Physics
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1063/1.1663148 →Countries where authors are citing Shock wave study of the α ⇄ ε phase transition in iron
This map shows the geographic impact of Shock wave study of the α ⇄ ε phase transition in iron. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Shock wave study of the α ⇄ ε phase transition in iron with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Shock wave study of the α ⇄ ε phase transition in iron more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Shock wave study of the α ⇄ ε phase transition in iron
This network shows the impact of Shock wave study of the α ⇄ ε phase transition in iron. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Shock wave study of the α ⇄ ε phase transition in iron.
About Shock wave study of the α ⇄ ε phase transition in iron
This paper, published in 1974, received 367 indexed citations . Written by L. M. Barker and R. E. Hollenbach covering the research area of Materials Chemistry. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Materials Chemistry (266 citations), Geophysics (139 citations), Mechanical Engineering (28 citations), Mechanics of Materials (11 citations) and Electrical and Electronic Engineering (10 citations). Published in Journal of Applied Physics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1063/1.1663148.