Development, maintenance and disruption of the blood-brain barrier
Impact in
- Neurology 759
Classified as
- Journal
- Nature Medicine
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1038/nm.3407 →Countries where authors are citing Development, maintenance and disruption of the blood-brain barrier
This map shows the geographic impact of Development, maintenance and disruption of the blood-brain barrier. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Development, maintenance and disruption of the blood-brain barrier with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Development, maintenance and disruption of the blood-brain barrier more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Development, maintenance and disruption of the blood-brain barrier
This network shows the impact of Development, maintenance and disruption of the blood-brain barrier. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Development, maintenance and disruption of the blood-brain barrier.
About Development, maintenance and disruption of the blood-brain barrier
This paper, published in 2013, received 1.9k indexed citations . Written by Birgit Obermeier, Richard Daneman and Richard M. Ransohoff covering the research area of Neurology and Oncology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Neurology (759 citations), Molecular Biology (589 citations), Neurology (212 citations), Biomedical Engineering (198 citations) and Physiology (198 citations). Published in Nature Medicine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1038/nm.3407.