Photoconductivity of Single Carbon Nanotubes
Impact in
Classified as
- Journal
- Nano Letters
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1021/nl034313e →Countries where authors are citing Photoconductivity of Single Carbon Nanotubes
This map shows the geographic impact of Photoconductivity of Single Carbon Nanotubes. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Photoconductivity of Single Carbon Nanotubes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Photoconductivity of Single Carbon Nanotubes more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Photoconductivity of Single Carbon Nanotubes
This network shows the impact of Photoconductivity of Single Carbon Nanotubes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Photoconductivity of Single Carbon Nanotubes.
About Photoconductivity of Single Carbon Nanotubes
This paper, published in 2003, received 539 indexed citations . Written by Marcus Freitag, James A. Misewich, Richard Martel and Phaedon Avouris covering the research area of Materials Chemistry and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Materials Chemistry (463 citations), Biomedical Engineering (213 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (211 citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (180 citations) and Polymers and Plastics (73 citations). Published in Nano Letters.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/nl034313e.