Current Rectification at Quartz Nanopipet Electrodes
Impact in
Classified as
- Journal
- Analytical Chemistry
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1021/ac970551g →Countries where authors are citing Current Rectification at Quartz Nanopipet Electrodes
This map shows the geographic impact of Current Rectification at Quartz Nanopipet Electrodes. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Current Rectification at Quartz Nanopipet Electrodes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Current Rectification at Quartz Nanopipet Electrodes more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Current Rectification at Quartz Nanopipet Electrodes
This network shows the impact of Current Rectification at Quartz Nanopipet Electrodes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Current Rectification at Quartz Nanopipet Electrodes.
About Current Rectification at Quartz Nanopipet Electrodes
This paper, published in 1997, received 494 indexed citations . Written by Wei Chang, Allen J. Bard and Stephen W. Feldberg covering the research area of Electrochemistry, Bioengineering and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Biomedical Engineering (409 citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (238 citations), Electrochemistry (122 citations), Bioengineering (70 citations) and Molecular Biology (61 citations). Published in Analytical Chemistry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/ac970551g.