Research synthesis in software engineering: A tertiary study
Impact in
Classified as
- Authors
- Daniela S. CruzesTore Dybå
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2011.01.004 →Countries where authors are citing Research synthesis in software engineering: A tertiary study
This map shows the geographic impact of Research synthesis in software engineering: A tertiary study. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Research synthesis in software engineering: A tertiary study with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Research synthesis in software engineering: A tertiary study more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Research synthesis in software engineering: A tertiary study
This network shows the impact of Research synthesis in software engineering: A tertiary study. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Research synthesis in software engineering: A tertiary study.
About Research synthesis in software engineering: A tertiary study
This paper, published in 2011, received 280 indexed citations . Written by Daniela S. Cruzes and Tore Dybå covering the research area of Computer Networks and Communications and Information Systems. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Information Systems (216 citations), Artificial Intelligence (57 citations), Computer Networks and Communications (49 citations), Software (46 citations) and Computer Science Applications (43 citations). Published in Information and Software Technology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2011.01.004.