The mathematical theory of diffusion and reaction in permeable catalysts
Impact in
Classified as
- Authors
- Gerald Rosen
- Journal
- Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1007/bf02459545 →Countries where authors are citing The mathematical theory of diffusion and reaction in permeable catalysts
This map shows the geographic impact of The mathematical theory of diffusion and reaction in permeable catalysts. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by The mathematical theory of diffusion and reaction in permeable catalysts with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The mathematical theory of diffusion and reaction in permeable catalysts more than expected).
Fields of papers citing The mathematical theory of diffusion and reaction in permeable catalysts
This network shows the impact of The mathematical theory of diffusion and reaction in permeable catalysts. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the The mathematical theory of diffusion and reaction in permeable catalysts.
About The mathematical theory of diffusion and reaction in permeable catalysts
This paper, published in 1976, received 859 indexed citations . Written by Gerald Rosen covering the research area of Inorganic Chemistry, Physical and Theoretical Chemistry and Catalysis. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Computational Theory and Mathematics (180 citations), Applied Mathematics (172 citations), Materials Chemistry (167 citations), Mechanical Engineering (156 citations) and Numerical Analysis (149 citations). Published in Bulletin of Mathematical Biology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1007/bf02459545.