The standardisation of terminology of lower urinary tract function
Impact in
- Rheumatology 1.3k
- Urology 1.2k
- Journal
- World Journal of Urology
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1007/bf00328107 →Countries where authors are citing The standardisation of terminology of lower urinary tract function
This map shows the geographic impact of The standardisation of terminology of lower urinary tract function. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by The standardisation of terminology of lower urinary tract function with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The standardisation of terminology of lower urinary tract function more than expected).
Fields of papers citing The standardisation of terminology of lower urinary tract function
This network shows the impact of The standardisation of terminology of lower urinary tract function. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the The standardisation of terminology of lower urinary tract function.
About The standardisation of terminology of lower urinary tract function
This paper, published in 1989, received 1.6k indexed citations . Written by Paul Abrams, Jerry G. Blaivas, Stuart L. Stanton and Jens Thorup Andersen. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Rheumatology (1.3k citations), Urology (1.2k citations), Epidemiology (501 citations), Surgery (490 citations) and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (138 citations). Published in World Journal of Urology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1007/bf00328107.