Identification of human chromosomes by DNA-binding fluorescent agents
Impact in
- Genetics 429
Classified as
- Journal
- Chromosoma
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1007/bf00282002 →Countries where authors are citing Identification of human chromosomes by DNA-binding fluorescent agents
This map shows the geographic impact of Identification of human chromosomes by DNA-binding fluorescent agents. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Identification of human chromosomes by DNA-binding fluorescent agents with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Identification of human chromosomes by DNA-binding fluorescent agents more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Identification of human chromosomes by DNA-binding fluorescent agents
This network shows the impact of Identification of human chromosomes by DNA-binding fluorescent agents. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Identification of human chromosomes by DNA-binding fluorescent agents.
About Identification of human chromosomes by DNA-binding fluorescent agents
This paper, published in 1970, received 836 indexed citations . Written by T. Caspersson, L. Zech, C. Johansson and Edward J. Modest covering the research area of Molecular Biology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Genetics (429 citations), Molecular Biology (413 citations), Plant Science (273 citations), Hematology (112 citations) and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (111 citations). Published in Chromosoma.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1007/bf00282002.